The Southern Strategy did not just aim to be the Party of Southern Whites, however. The talking point of “States’ Rights” was used to court White voters in areas where the Federal government to force integration was doing busing campaigns at gunpoint. They took White children across town to Black neighborhoods and take Black children into predominantly White neighborhoods. These forced integration projects of course turned out to be abysmal failures. In areas like South Boston it has taken over forty years for public officials to admit this.
Test scores either stayed the same or fell, community cohesion fell to pieces, and violence within schools also soared. Parental and community opposition to forced integration and busing led to protests throughout America with the Democratic politicians increasingly abandoning their States’ Rights and community choice position and throwing in with the Leftist elites of the new Democratic Party.
White communities felt like their voices weren’t being heard because Federal authorities steadfastly refused to change their positions on forced busing while local groups like the Boston School Committee denounced the busing program for causing “bloodshed and racial hatred.”
Democratic politicians like Boston Mayor Kevin White “banned all public meetings or gatherings of more than three people in South Boston to try to limit the opposition to busing,” but this left millions of White Americans on both sides of the Mason-Dixon line frustrated with their government officials and looking for representation for their concerns in an America that demographically and culturally was changing from the historic norms of traditional America.
Republicans were able to take a a huge segment of former Democrat voters through targeting White working- and middle-class folks. This started with Barry Goldwater coming out against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but the Southern Strategy really took its stride with Richard Nixon who ran on a “law and order” and States’ Rights. This platform appealed to White Americans who were concerned about integration, Federal overreach, and the rise of far-Left groups on America’s streets and universities. This strategy allowed the Republicans to go from losing the Deep South to Alabama Governor George Wallace in 1968 to taking clean sweeps of former Democrat–but majority White–areas of the Midwest and South throughout the 1970’s until today. States like West Virginia that held out as Democratic strongholds until recently have now gone solidly Republican.
The New York Daily News discussed the Southern Strategy by noting,
“Nixon was hardly the first Republican to notice that Lyndon Johnson’s civil rights legislation had alienated whites both in the South and elsewhere — Johnson himself had forecast that Southern whites would desert the Democratic Party…Johnson and the Democrats had wooed the black vote; Nixon would do the same for the white vote.”As the Republicans lost the Black vote to the newly refashioned Democrats, they needed a base if they were going to compete in both State and Federal elections, that was found in the increasingly disenfranchised White folk of rural areas in the Midwest and South.
If the Republican Party had just been honest with itself and become vocal White advocates for Whites in America, we would likely not be in the same dire situation today that we now face. Driving into coded language about “States’ Rights” and “welfare cuts” did not answer the real racial problems in America, they only tried to court White voters into supporting the Republican Party. Republicans have always been shortsighted on racial issues, never actually wanting to defend the interests of Whites but using them as pawns in a battle against the Democrats, not the Democrats ideology.
The fact that Ronald Reagan kicked off his 1980 campaign in Philadelphia, Mississippi, a town that was a hotbed of desegregation and Klan activity during the Civil Rights era, showed his rededication to the winning Southern Strategy that Nixon had won the Deep South on. Reagan in his declaration speech said “I believe in state’s rights; I believe in people doing as much as they can for themselves at the community level and at the private level.” This part of his speech was clear dog whistling on racial issues and issues of the Federal government forcing desegregation, busing and welfare programs on White citizens who didn’t want them.
“Reagan took the Republican Party from virtual irrelevance to the ascendancy it now enjoys. The essence of that transformation, we shouldn’t forget, is the party’s successful wooing of the race-exploiting Southern Democrats formerly known as Dixiecrats.”Lee Atwater, a Reagan and Bush strategist explained the policy:
“You start out in 1954 by saying, ‘Nigger, nigger, nigger.’ By 1968 you can’t say ‘nigger’ — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights and all that stuff. You’re getting so abstract now [that] you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I’m not saying that. But I’m saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, ‘We want to cut this,’ is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than ‘Nigger, nigger.'”The Republican Party became dominant in American politics due to racial dog whistling and courting racially aware Whites. That is without a doubt. The difference between Leftist news pundits and myself is that I don’t think that was a bad thing. Tribal welfare trumps the voting habits of every group of people in not only America, but the world. Whites should not be embarrassed about organizing for their best interests of their extended family. What White voters should have done is not throw in with the Republicans after the Republicans refused to follow through on their promises of fighting for White interests.
The 2012 election is a clear indicator of how high support is among Whites viewing the Republican Party as the de facto political vehicle for White interests. If only White voters had cast ballots in the 2012 election, President Obama would have lost the electoral college 68 to 438, a stunning landslide for the Republicans. States like Mississippi in 2012 had 89% of all White voters cast their ballots for Mitt Romney while 93% of Black voters supported President Obama. There are clear racial divides in American politics and the Hispanic, Black, and Asian communities vote almost monolithically for the Democrat Party while over two-thirds of White voters stand behind the Republican Party.
Basic polling on issues of economics or social policy find that most voters cannot properly articulate the positions of their chosen candidates and Party. What matters is that American politics is winning the racial headcount. Black voters who are socially conservative on social issues still vote Democrat even though the GOP better articulates their religious views on abortion and gay marriage. Asians generally support lower taxes and should be as American Enterprise Institute’s Charles Murray says “a natural Republican constituency, Asians should define ‘natural’,” yet Asians voted 71% for Barack Obama in the 2012 election.
Regardless of individual social or economic views non-White voters have cemented themselves as the foundation and the future of the Democratic Party. Attempts by the Republican elite to promote non-Whites in the Republican Party, running more “diverse” candidates and investing countless millions of dollars in “minority outreach” have been met by communities of color with silence or outright mocking, but above all these programs have not made new Republican voters.
“Data suggest that no amount of repackaging is going to produce major minority voter gains for Republicans. Only actual platform revisions and policy changes — real shifts in the party’s positions — seem capable of a job this big.”The question would then remain: Why exactly would communities of color vote for Democrat-lite when they can vote for the real thing? The GOP has proven through the 1986 amnesty and dozens of failed programs to court non-White voters that have been met with abysmal failure in pushing up non-White support for the Republicans and an alienation of the White Republican base that leaving the Southern Strategy may very well be the end of the Republicans on the national political stage.
Trends show that the Republicans supporting liberal positions and catering to non-Whites is not winning new non-White voters, it is only losing millions of White voters for the GOP. If Mitt Romney had received the same amount of support that John McCain did in 2008 he would have won the election in 2012, but …”Romney won 1.3 million fewer than McCain in 2008.”
Henry Wolff of American Renaissance wrote after the 2012 election that,
“If whites do become a minority of the electorate, even a successful strategy of consolidating their votes will not work at the national level. But in the meantime, any Republican support for amnesty, more legal immigration, and any other policy that increases the non-white percentage of the electorate would only add fuel to the Party’s funeral pyre.”The Republicans only hope is to return to the Southern Strategy and actively work to win White voters but due to Political Correctness and the corruption of the Party by the Zionist and business lobby, the chances of the Republican Establishment turning back towards White voters is unlikely, if impossible.
Now as the Republican Party has decided to become “more inclusive,” which is a nice way of saying that the Party is abandoning their base lock, stock and barrel and still expecting the base to turn out at the polls it appears that the Republicans are done for, at least that is until the rise of Donald Trump.
Donald Trump has positioned himself to be the first candidate since Pat Buchanan in the early 1990s to do what the White Republican base actually wants on immigration; deportation of illegal immigrants and enforcement of Federal immigration laws. While the mainstream GOP candidates have to follow the marching orders from the big Party donors and elites and cater to illegal immigrants and the desires of big business lobbies, Donald Trump can afford to actually speak to the desires of the Republican Party base.
The fact that Donald Trump is not a bought man by the big money donors of the Republican elite such as the Chamber of Commerce who cares far more about corporate tax rates than they do about the ethnic composition or cultural well-being of their country, who are the absolute worst shills for unchecked immigration, is why he can follow the views of the base where “half of Iowa’s expected Republican caucus-goers favor deporting” and “80 percent of voters [who] see illegal immigration as a serious national problem.” Almost by what appears to be an accident, Donald Trump has positioned himself as a fighter of the “silent majority” as Nixon was and once again rally the White voters of America.
“A 2012 Pew Poll found that 69 percent of Americans want to place greater restrictions on who was allowed into the United States. A recent poll from Kellyanne Conway found that a plurality of Americans wish to see a moratorium on immigration for the time being. And a separate poll by KellyAnne Conway found that Hispanics, by nearly a seven to one ratio, want employers to hire workers already in the country rather than importing foreign workers to fill jobs. Black voters support this measure by a ratio of almost 30 to 1.”No one, other than Jewish elites and self-hating White liberals, want to have their jobs and communities filled with people who drive down wages, increase crime and further fragment America’s already broken and failed multicultural experiment. By not even trying, Trump could get the largest White, Black and Hispanic support that the GOP has had in recent elections, all while not apologizing and groveling like the rest of the Republican contenders.
In the bizarre world of the 2016 Presidential Election it looks as if nothing can stop a former reality television star and business mogul from becoming the populist candidate for the White working and middle class. While I do not think that Donald Trump is anything but a civic nationalist, any basic understanding of economics unskilled Third World immigration is bad for America, Donald Trump is blowing the dog whistle for White racial interests harder than any other candidate, and louder than the Republic elites would ever dream a candidate would do in our politically correct age.
The reason that Trump can dominate is because the #Cuckservatives of the Republican Establishment are forced by their own allegiance to political correctness or the demands of their paymasters are forced to fight politically with both hands tied behind their back. Even Zionist lackeys like Senator Ted Cruz point out that “The people who show up at the polls, who elected you and me, and who elected this Republican majority… far too many of the Republican donors look down on those voters as a bunch of ignorant hicks and rubes.”
There is a disconnect between the Republican base and the donor class, a divide that is both religious and racial. The Jewish mega donors hate the fact that the Republican base is both Christian and White. Jews have a religious and tribal hatred of both Christianity and the European people, primarily because of our long history as being the front-lines of the Christian Church for the past two thousand years. Jewish elites want to destroy Christianity and the European people through their social, political and economic weapons so it should not be surprising that their interests are the opposite of the interests of White Americans.
Republican mega donors like Sheldon Adelson, Norman Braman, Howard Jonas, Mel Sembler and the rest of the Republican Jewish Coalition believe in strong borders and defense for Israel, but a prostrated and defenseless America and Europe. These donors like Fred Zeidman make immigration an issue about the Jewish people and what is best for the Jewish mercantile class, not what is best for the American people.
Zeidman told reporters that the GOP has to support amnesty because “The rest of the party has to understand what we as Jews have always understood — that this is a nation of immigrants and to ignore them is to end up losing.” While standing strong on immigration enforcement and deportation of illegal immigrants will win elections and votes, the Jewish power structure of the GOP is not interested in victory or the desires of everyday White folks, only positions that benefit fellow Jews politically and financially.
The battle lines of 2016 are going to be the Jewish backed candidates and the White American’s candidate. Whoever the GOP picks to go up against Donald Trump is assured to be kosher and the primary battle and potential election with Trump possibly running independent will get bloody. To the Jewish puppet masters of the Republican Party to lose control of the Party, albeit temporarily, to someone who cannot be bought or sold is something that cannot be allowed under any circumstances.
While Donald Trump is neither a Traditionalist nor a White nationalist, he is a threat to the economic and social powers of the international Jew. For this reason alone as long as Trump stands strong on deportation and immigration enforcement we should support his candidacy insofar as we can use it to push more hardcore positions on immigration and Identity. Donald Trump is not the savior of Whites in America, he is however a booming salvo across the bow of the Left and Jewish power to tell them that White America is awakening, and we are tired of business as usual.
The march to victory will not be won by Donald Trump in 2016, but this could be the stepping stone we need to then radicalize millions of White working and middle class families to the call to truly begin a struggle for Faith, family and folk. For this reason alone I will campaign for Donald Trump because as the saying goes “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” and that is doubly true if that person is viewed as an enemy by the International Jew.